IEEE P7700
What is this standard?
The P7700 Recommended Practice for the Responsible Design and Development of Neurotechnologies is a new category of voluntary consensus-based socio-technical standard offering a uniform set of definitions, and process guidance to assess the ethical and socio-technical considerations and practices regarding the responsible design, development, and use of neurotechnologies.
IEEE expanded their governance standard offerings that guide organizations on ethical design and deployment to cover neurotechnologies. We refer to neurotechnology as any technology that provides greater insight into brain or nervous system activity, or affects brain or nervous system function. As such, there are a range of individual technologies for which standards are being developed/have been developed that complement this proposed standard.
P7700 reflects on the unique characteristics of neurotechnology and its impact on individuals and society. As neurotechnologies potentially influence brain activity, they can have effects on intimately human processes such as cognition, identity and human agency. Moreover, neurotechnology applications extend beyond medical use to a wide variety of consumer areas (gaming, wellness, workplace). The standard's primary aim is to provide neurotechnology developers and government agencies a uniform set of definitions, and a methodology to assess the ethical and socio-technical considerations and practices regarding the design, development, and use of neurotechnologies. The standard adopts a responsible research and innovation approach, which enables developers, researchers, users, and regulators to anticipate and address ethical and sociocultural implications of neurotechnologies, mitigating negative unintended consequences while increasing community support and engagement with neurotechnology innovators.
Why is it important?
Neurotechnology can be used purely for research purposes, such as experimental brain imaging to gather information about mental illness or sleep patterns. It can also be used in practical applications to influence the brain or nervous system; for example, in therapeutic or rehabilitative contexts. More recently, several developments have been made in the consumer arena, making certain neurotechnologies accessible to individuals for a variety of non-medical purposes, including wellness and fatigue monitoring.
Significant work on neuroethics has been done in the past 20 years, which has identified considerable opportunities and challenges. However, at the start of this standard working group there were no international recommendations on how to translate ethical considerations into everyday practice of technology research, design, development, and use. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is one of the few international organizations that developed a set of recommendations for neurotechnology with a focus on policy makers and medical applications. More recently, this year UNESCO started working on their ethical recommendations for neurotechnology.
Compared to these two organizations, IEEE Standard Association can leverage several years of experience developing technical standards and use that knowledge to focus more recently on socio-technical standards. P7700 will be the first truly socio-technical standard aimed at fostering the ethical and efficient innovation of neurotechnology that meets societal and community values at an international level with a focus on the neuroengineering community, developers, and regulators of neurotechnologies.
The multilayered complexity of technologies that interface with the brain and nervous system present unique considerations to those developing them and regulating them. The new standard is important because this type of practical guidance and tools explicitly helps developers and regulators on how to reflect and respond in a responsible manner to the implications of neurotechnology for individuals and society. IEEE P7700 not only prioritizes the need to address the risks and negative impact to people and society, but also on how to continue expanding the positive impacts of neurotechnology.
What is a real-world example/case study of how this might help?
As a new neurotechnology is being developed, developers can use this standard to integrate socio-technical considerations in the process of design and development (for example, they can mention compliance with this standard when submitting a proposal to a funding agency), while regulators can use it to add due diligence as these technologies enter the market. IEEE P7700 will offer “how-to” general guidance, as well as provide criteria to help evaluate each suggested process and case studies to help with the interpretation and practical use of the standard.
What stage is it at?
We were green lit to start at the end of 2022, but the kickoff meeting took place in January 2023. We have been working hard on building the outline and drafting key areas. We have not yet started voting on any major parts of the standard, but we envision by the end of this year to have some of the proposed processes fleshed out for vote. We have had fluctuation in participation, and while we have a core number of interested volunteers, we certainly are open to a more robust participation of those interested in the responsible development of neurotechnology. We are aiming to start the IEEE ballot process in early 2026, and we are targeting early 2027 for publication.
What is the current geographical or disciplinary spread of your working members?
The core working group members come from 6 different countries (USA, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Japan) but the broader working group members include other countries, such as China and Germany. The disciplinary spread covers engineers, lawyers, social science researchers, ethicists, and neurotechnology developers.
What type of people might be interested or well suited for this standards group?
Anyone who is interested and committed to the responsible design, development and use of neurotechnology for the benefit of humanity. More specifically, people who want and can contribute their time and knowledge to drafting and refining the process tools and recommendations. There is a wide range of people that can contribute their expertise, from academics, neuro engineers, neurotechnology developers, policy makers, government program leaders, data scientists, lawyers, social scientists, and users of neurotechnology would be well suited for the group.
What triggered your own interest in this area?
I have been the Chair for the IEEE BRAIN Neuroethics subcommittee since 2021, and our work developing a neuroethics framework made me realize the importance of having a socio-technical standard focused on neurotechnology. At the time, the OECD has been the only large international organization working on recommendations for neurotechnology. I learned about IEEE Standards Association involvement in the P7000 series of socio-technical standards, and it made perfect sense to have IEEE SA working on a socio-technical standard on neurotechnology. In late 2021, I had several meetings and conversations about the process to start a new standard group, and consulted with several colleagues to make sure the development of such a standard made sense. After all those conversations in mid-2022 we submitted the project authorization request to start this new working group, and got approved to start at the end of 2022.
My engineering and ethics background laid the foundation for my interest and understanding in this area. There is no doubt that neurotechnologies bring incredible opportunities to help treat brain and mental health disorders, to help diagnose them, and to increase wellbeing. Yet, they also raise important considerations about their implications for both individuals and societies. As more neurotechnologies expand beyond the medical setting, the more we need to be engaged in reflecting and responding to these considerations.
It has been a very interesting experience as this is the first time I am involved with developing a socio-technical standard, but I am excited to contribute and work with amazing colleagues. To start, I have the privilege to work with Ricardo Chavarriaga, the vice chair of the working group. There are also a number of dedicated working group members helping draft and engaging in constructive discussion on the processes and tools for responsible neurotechnology development, design, and use in our monthly meetings. It is the team effort that keeps the course of the working group, and we (Ricardo and I) thank them all for their work and patience as we navigate the intricacies of leading a new working group.
Call to Action
If you would like to get in touch, please email me as Chair, IEEE P7700 ([email protected]) or contact the IEEE Standards Association Program Manager, Christy Bahn ([email protected]) to indicate your interest.